August 19, 2014  Last Update: April 21, 2014, 9:13 pm

Shock Therapy on Trial : Judge Rotenberg School

Fox News courtroom video of the Judge Rotenberg School trial.

In a Massachussetts courtroom, the Judge Rotenberg Center for special needs children is on trial. Yesterday a video was shown to the jury, exposing an example of electric shock “treatment” utilized by center staff in an attempt to train then 8 year old Andre McCollins to comply with requests from authority figures. Andre was a special needs child. He has refused to take off his coat. He was restrained, face-down, on the floor of a classroom, and given 31 electric shocks over hours of time.

Mother Jones magazine has profiled the center in the past, and the current trial is a civil lawsuit from now 18 year old Andre McCollins and his mother, who had sent him into the school. According to Mother Jones,

we ran a devastating exposé of the Judge Rotenberg Center, a "school" that took mentally and psychologically troubled kids from across the country and treated them by hooking them up to electrodes and shocking them whenever they misbehaved or displayed symptoms of their disorders, like autism. Reports from former students and staff were horrific...despite the investigations and ongoing lawsuits, the school managed to stay open open

The Judge Rotenberg Center is a school for children with autism and other special needs. From their website:

The JUDGE ROTENBERG CENTER (JRC) is a special needs school in Canton, Massachusetts serving ages 3-adult. For 39 years JRC has provided very effective education and treatment to both emotionally disturbed students with conduct, behavior, emotional, and/or psychiatric problems and developmentally delayed students with autistic-like behaviors.

This video and the shocking news reports are getting widespread coverage. This is the first exposure of several generations of people to shock therapy (better known as electroconvulsive therapy or ECT), which has been extremely controversial since it was first used in Europe in the early 1900s.

The last major wave of negative awareness of ECT in the US was in the 1970s. A government investigative panel determined that while the “inducing convulsions to treat psychiatric disorders” part was effective and better than institutionalizing unstable patients,  ECT was also being abused by hospital staff as a means of controlling higher maintenance patients. Actor Jack Nicholson brought widespread negative attention to the issue in the movie “One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest”, based on a 1962 novel said to be based on real experiences at an Oregon mental institution. Some treatment professionals report that new patients in need of treatments for behavioral or other disorders cite One Flew Over the Cukoo’s Nest as a reason they fear asking for help from treatment centers and institutions charged with providing help. Most treatment at institutions for the severely mentally ill today is delivered with medication (pills) such as thorazine.

Electric shock therapy is on trial again, the media is having a field day with the shocking videos, and the alleged use as a tool to control non-compliant autistic kids is being compared to torture.

 

Please share this post with your networks:

Shocking video of school admins electro-shocking autistic 8 year old for not removing his coat
Facebook

 

Update: The school has posted a “Response to Recent Articles and Bog Posts” in PDF form. The text is exposed below. We note that the school admirably describes the context of the trial and the video. However, we must also note that the school appends a sincere effort to discredit former employee Greg Miller, who has been critical of the school. Reasonable human beings know that an employee fighting to keep his job while disagreeing with the policies of his employer is under duress. Agreements signed under duress should be suspect, not held up as fact. This “update” would have beenmore credible without the added demonstration of poor management the addendum seems to represent.

 

The Judge Rotenberg Educational Center (JRC) educates and treats the most difficult behaviorally involved students in the nation. Aversive therapy, which includes skin shock treatments with devices such as the GED (graduated electronic decelerator), are incorporated into court-approved treatment plans for students who struggle with violent, abusive or mutilating behaviors toward themselves or others, only after their families have exhausted other therapies, and other residential programs and psychiatric facilities. In many cases, the student’s parents have removed them from previous placements because they spent much of their time physically and mechanically restrained or chemically sedated; in other cases, the students are discharged by these other facilities because they are unable to handle the student’s behaviors.

Most students at JRC do not received aversive therapy. It is only administered when other therapy options have been exhausted and parents petition the court; each case is also reviewed and approved by a Human Rights Committee, a Peer Review Committee, and a physician. There are hundreds of peer reviewed scientific journal articles on the safe and effective use of contingent skin shock, several of which are specific to the treatment success at JRC. We understand the video of a student from 2002 is difficult to watch, and it is no way an example of a normal day at JRC. The video depicts JRC physicians, psychologists and staff attempting to treat the student on a very unusually difficult day. The sole reason the recording exists is because JRC maintains cameras in every room where a student may receive treatment and is the only such facility to do so. This is for the protection of the students in our care and is precisely to enable us to review every application of the GED and to learn from it. Our staff is committed to serving these students, when no other facility can or will, and finding the best ways to manage their behaviors to a level where they are no longer causing severe injury and pain to themselves, can learn, can live in the community and can spend time with their family and friends. It is also important to note that during the court proceedings during which the 2002 tape was played, all of the experts, including the plaintiff’s, agreed that the use of the GED was effective and necessary for certain students and had worked with the student whose family had brought suit.

The Judge Rotenberg Education Center’s former employee, Greg Miller, advocated for aversive treatment during his three years of employment and only changed his position after several suspensions and his ultimate separation from his job. His petition is based on his many false statements, which of course contradict his signed written acknowledgments that he had seen no mistreatment during the three years he worked at JRC. Miller left his employment at JRC after being suspended for poor job performance and sent a letter to JRC begging to keep his job, noting how much he enjoyed working at the school. While working at JRC, Mr. Miller criticized his fellow employees for not using the GED more frequently to treat problematic behavior. He also stated that he had never heard nor seen any treatment that was cruel, inhuman or disrespectful of any student’s human rights, having signed affidavits as a mandated reporter of not being aware “of any rumor, allegation or report” of abuse and attesting to the same.

More resources:

Comments

  1. Although the Judge Rotenberg Center is the only facility in the United States (maybe the world) to shock children as a punishment, abuse of this sort is extremely common in residential “treatment” centers for “troubled” teens. In fact the Government Accountability Office (GAO) did a number of reports on the issue (sources will be given). They had this and many other horrifying things to say:

    1. GAO found thousands of allegations of abuse…GAO could not identify a more concrete number of allegations because it could not locate a single Web site, federal agency, or other entity that collects comprehensive nationwide data.
    2. During 2005 alone, 33 states reported 1,619 staff members involved in incidents of abuse in residential programs. GAO could not identify a more concrete number of allegations because it could not locate a single Web site, federal agency, or other entity that collects comprehensive nationwide data.
    GAO Investigation Documents/Video:
    http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d08146t.pdf
    http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d08713t.pdf
    http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d09719t.pdf
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wdhsk-T6krs (VIDEO of testimony to US Congress).

    One can, of course, extrapolate that if nobody was keeping track on a national level and that oversight varies widely from State to State (Missouri for example has no licensing, accreditation or approval requirements for private schools) that there are many more perpetrators, particularly in the 17 States not represented in the report. Furthermore, one may easily assume that each staff member, on average, was involved in more than one case of abuse. Finally, the news reports of abusive facilities are abundant, though often ignored and rarely making the national press. I will throw just a handful out there, in a moment.

    Another horrifying report by the Department of Justice says that 12% of inmates in juvenile detention report sexual abuse, mostly by staff (9,000 minors interviewed). In some facilities as many as 30% report being raped.
    http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/15/opinion/15fri3.html?_r=1

    Finally, a few resources on individual schools:
    Articles Concerning Mt. Bachelor Academy/Other Facilities (Maia Szalavitz):
    http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1891082,00.html
    http://healthland.time.com/2011/07/12/former-students-of-a-school-for-troubled-teens-sue-for-emotional-sexual-abuse/
    http://healthland.time.com/2011/10/07/new-efforts-to-crack-down-on-residential-programs-for-troubled-teens/
    http://healthland.time.com/2011/04/05/increasingly-internet-activism-helps-shutter-abusive-troubled-teen-boot-camps/

    PBS Montana: Who’s Watching the Kids?
    http://watch.montanapbs.org/video/1430387622/

    Picture of a Child in the High Impact (WWASP) Dog Cages, High Impact was a particularly abusive facility:
    http://www.google.com/imgres?q=high+impact+dog+cages&um=1&hl=en&sa=N&biw=1260&bih=649&tbm=isch&tbnid=GgP8cTQEw48Q-M:&imgrefurl=http://domestic-prisoners-of-conscience.weebly.com/blog.html&docid=LLGw_ToFtKIT6M&imgurl=http://henrikhansen93.home.webname.dk/images/highimpact.jpg&w=352&h=320&ei=VRw4T4WWGoGztwely8irAg&zoom=1&iact=hc&vpx=467&vpy=141&dur=167&hovh=214&hovw=235&tx=158&ty=125&sig=117697010717945438412&page=1&tbnh=138&tbnw=152&start=0&ndsp=18&ved=1t:429,r:2,s:0

    St. John’s military Academy (branded students, broken legs, shattered eye socket):
    http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/kan-military-school-seeks-dismissal-abuse-suit-16102140#.T5ISmGP7T1Q
    http://www.hutchnews.com/Localregional/st–johns

    Family First Boot Camp (Warning: disturbing videos included):
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/10/27/kelvin-sgt-mac-mcfarland-boot-camp-video_n_1051216.html

    If you really want to lose your cookies, look up World Wide Association of Specialty Programs, Straight inc., and Elan. Material on WWASP is most readily available; however, Straight and Elan (essentially a particularly nasty Straight clone) are templates for the modern industry. if you really want to dig deep, look up Synanon, a militant anti-drug cult responsible for the tactics at Mount Bachelor Academy (Elan and Straight use the same tactics of humiliation, and sometimes WWASP too).

    And concerning the effectiveness (they aren’t):
    Department of Health and Human Services (National Institutes of Health) says that “programs limited to scare tactics…toughness” are largely ineffective:
    http://consensus.nih.gov/2004/2004YouthViolencePreventionSOS023html.htm

    Incidentally:
    Lots of students are speaking up about Diamond Ranch Academy, which Drew recommended, too.
    “I got there when the day was almost over. They take you to the blue house… they gave me clothes and told me to change into them. So I took the clothes and went to walk back to the bathroom and they said, “no, you can’t go to the bathroom, you have to change right here.” I told them I wasn’t taking my clothes off in front of them, and they said, “Okay, we can do this the hard way or the easy way.” And that’s when I gave up and let them tell me what to do. … I stood there naked and humiliated as they made sure I didn’t have anything hidden. I felt like a criminal. I felt so dirty and ashamed. I cannot begin to express the humiliation I felt.
    Brianna, attended DRA March 19, 2007 to December 19, 2007″.

  2. sad and stupid both.. the best shock for a difficult child is ” take a walk into the zoo ” and watch together the animals and discuss about. this kind of child needs shock through enviromental changes not thru elecric shocks !

Speak Your Mind

*

You are reading the category "Treatment & Recovery - " which is a PERMANENT category.